‎Final Cut Pro on the Mac App Store

Looking for:

Best apple laptop for final cut pro x free

Click here to Download

The Macbook Pro—and you should get the fastest, most powerful one available. It will cost you, but video editing is one of the most intensive things a consumer. As Apple’s Final Cut Pro only works on Apple computers, you have limited choices, especially when shopping on a budget. The MacBook and MacBook. Final Cut Pro revolutionizes post-production with ° video editing and motion graphics, 4K HDR support, and advanced tools for color correction.


– Final Cut Pro – Free Trial – Apple

Final Cut Pro combines revolutionary video editing with powerful media organization and incredible performance to let you create at the speed of thought. Final Cut Pro revolutionizes post-production with ° video, HDR, and advanced tools for color correction. Try it now with a free day trial.


Best apple laptop for final cut pro x free –


Not sold on a Mac? We have plenty of Windows-running alternatives in our list of the best laptops for video editing. The MacBook Pro inch, released in October , is one of the best laptops you can buy, and certainly one of the best for video editing. It uses the powerful new M1 Chip iterations, either the M1 Pro or the M1 Max if you need the utmost in speed — to the point of being twice or even four times as fast as the MacBook Pro.

What this means in real terms is that the MacBook Pro inch can support editing multiple streams of 8K video in real-time without rendering. The ProRes accelerator in the chips’ media engineers also means that video processing is more efficient, and so won’t be as punishing on battery life.

If you’re working with a lot of video then you’ll likely want to have as much storage as possible, and this MacBook Pro can be configured with up to 8TB of storage. Of course, a lot of what we’ve said is also true of the smaller MacBook Pro 14 see below — however, if your budget can accommodate it, the larger screen of the inch version will mean you have a much easier time working in your editing interface, and you won’t catch yourself dreaming of an external monitor.

When we tested it, we found the only real downside to this inch Macbook other than its price is that it is pretty heavy, at 2. If you’re going to be carrying your video editing laptop around all day, something like the inch version might be a better bet.

Otherwise, this is simply the best video-editing laptop you can get. See our full MacBook Pro inch review for more. As we mentioned in the entry above, our testing found inch MacBook offers pretty much the same level of performance as its inch sibling.

You have the same choice of processors, between the M1 Pro and the M1 Max, and this means you still get the incredible speeds and optimised chips that make it a matter of simplicity to work with and render even ultra-high-resolution video. It’s that fast. So basically, the question you have to answer is: can you live with the smaller screen? It makes the editing interface more cramped, and if you’re going to be working on this device all day, that might get annoying.

True, you can always get an additional monitor, but if you’ve already spent this much on a MacBook, the idea of having to spend yet more on another screen might well stick in the craw more than a little. Still, the MacBook Pro inch M1 Pro, M1 Max, is an excellent choice — beyond excellent, in fact — for anyone who wants a portable video-editing machine.

It’ll do everything you need, and then some. See our Apple MacBook Pro inch review here. While the new inch MacBook Pro is our top choice as the best MacBook for video editing, the previous device shouldn’t be dismissed if you find a good deal.

When we tested it, we judged it still very powerful — and the gorgeous inch screen makes editing videos a joy. It’s slightly lighter than the newer model, and best of all, you’re more likely to find discounts on the device due to the release of subsequent Macbooks.

This MacBook predates the M1 revolution where Apple brought its processor production in house, and so uses a 9th-generation Intel Core i7, or an i9 if you go for the top-of-the-line version. Make no mistake, this is still a very fast processor. In everything but the most ridiculously high-intensity video processing tasks, you’ll find it to be more than capable of keeping up. Find out more in our Apple MacBook Pro inch review.

The MacBook Pro inch M1, is the best MacBook for video editing if you’re looking for something really portable. The smaller inch screen doesn’t give you the amount of workspace the inch or even the inch offer, and the resolution isn’t the highest, but when we tested it, we found it is still gorgeous, with support for the P3 colour gamut – essential for most professional filmmakers.

The model looks the same as previous versions on the outside, but Apple made big improvements on the inside, thanks to its M1 chip. It’s not as fast as the M1 Pro and M1 Max that you get in the devices, but it still offers excellent performance when editing 4K and even 8K footage, and battery life is also very good, letting you work on your masterpieces for hours on end without having to plug in.

In our MacBook Pro inch M1, review , we thought it a shame there weren’t enough ports but appreciated how silently it runs so it won’t interfere with audio editing.

Apple’s iconic iMac got a huge new redesign in Not only has it got a bold new look which comes in various colours , it’s thinner, lighter and comes with a larger inch screen compared to the Best of all, it feature’s the Apple M1 chip – the same one that powers the inch MacBook Pro above.

While the MacBook Pro is now more powerful, our testing found the benefit here is that you get a larger screen, which many people will find it more comfortable to work on we did. It’s also more affordable, though you do miss out on the sheer portability that the inch MacBook Pro offers.

As far as desktop PCs go, we think it’s an excellent device to edit videos on. It’s all-in-one design means the computer is built into the screen, so there’s no awkward wires or cables to plug in.

Just hook it up to a power source, connect the wireless keyboard and mouse, and away you go. Check out our Apple iMac M1 review for more info. If you’re after an absolute powerhouse of a Mac for video editing, and you’ve got plenty of budget, then the Apple Mac Pro is definitely worth investing in. The Mac Pro can be configured to come with hardware that makes intensive video editing tasks complete much faster than less powerful PCs, and this can have a huge impact on your workflow.

While it is very powerful and very expensive, there are plenty of configuration options, which lets you pick the specs that best suit your needs and budget. It’s also got a modular design, which means unlike Apple’s other devices, like the iMac above, it’s easy to upgrade parts of the system later on.

This means it can be future-proofed for years to come. The Apple Mac Pro won’t be for everyone. The MacBook Pro is actually now more powerful if you get it with the M1 Max chip, but of course here you benefit from a more comfortable screen size to work on.

On the other hand, for many non-professional video editors the Mac Pro is complete overkill. However, if you want the best video editing performance on a desktop PC, this is your device.

Apple radically overhauled its most affordable MacBook, the MacBook Air, at the end of , and when we reviewed it, we found the upgrades mean it’s one of the best MacBooks you can buy for video editing.

So, our testing found it’s got a tremendous amount of power under its hood and can easily handle editing 4K video in Final Cut Pro without breaking a sweat. We loved how its fanless design also means that it is pretty much completely silent when in use.

And, as with previous MacBook Airs, it features a gorgeous thin and light design that makes it easy to carry around with you. Also, for the first time in a MacBook Air, the latest model supports the P3 colour gamut, which means the screen can display accurate colours, a consideration that’s incredibly important for video editors.

Apple is also still the benchmark in terms of the TrackPad, because the cursor control including gestures is flawless in combination with the operating system.

Gliding capabilities are excellent and there are many options to configure it like shifting windows with three fingers. Apple manages a pixel density of ppi, both for the 14 as well as the inch MacBook Pro models. Since the display is obviously larger, the resolution is higher as well. It manages extremely low black values and very high contrast ratios similar to OLED panels. Due to the technology, however, there are visible halo effects when bright contents are displayed on dark backgrounds.

This is just a small criticism though, because the subjective picture impression is excellent. All contents are very sharp and crisp, because macOS does not have any scaling problems despite the high resolution and black is really black, which results in extremely high-contrast images.

HDR contents in particular look amazing and the viewing-angle stability is great. However, this does not really help most of the time because most everyday stuff uses SDR contents, where the brightness is once again limited to little more than nits, which is on par with the predecessor. The Mini-LED panel has an advantage thanks to the superior contrast ratio. As soon as an application with HDR images preview window in Final Cut, for example requires more brightness, the panel will provide it.

The frequency is very high and will not be an issue for most users, but the panel of the new MacBook Pro 16 is not suited for you if you are very sensitive to the flickering. This constant flickering also makes it extremely hard to determine the response times. They are pretty slow according to our measurements, but you do not really notice ghosting in practice. The Safari browser is one of these apps, so do not expect smoother scrolling yet.

The notch and the areas next to it, which are used for menu items, are basically sitting on top of the regular aspect ratio screen and do not block any portion of the panel. The notch does not look very appealing and there can still be some functional issues, but there are already tools available to black out the menu bar, so you will never see the notch. Our analysis with the professional CalMAN software and the X-Rite i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer shows that the panel calibration of the new MBP 16 is not as good compared to the inch unit out of the box.

The color temperature is slightly too cool and there is a minor blue cast in the grayscale. Unfortunately, we are not able to calibrate the panel with our device. The frequency of Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. If PWM was detected, an average of minimum: 5 – maximum: Hz was measured.

The MacBook Pro 16 does have a glossy screen surface, but it is not as reflective as many other laptops with glossy displays or touchscreens. You can still work pretty comfortably outdoors even in brighter environments as long as you avoid reflections, but the panel would obviously benefit from higher brightness levels.

The CPU performance will pretty much stay the same; some apps might benefit from more memory. The M1 Pro consists of two efficiency clusters two cores up to 2, MHz in combination with two performance clusters with 4 cores each up to 3.

This means the single-core performance is also comparable, which is also the case for the optional M1 Max chip. One major advantage of the new MacBook Pro 16 is that the performance is stable, both under sustained workloads and on battery power. More CPU benchmarks are available here. The new MacBook Pro 16 is a very fast multimedia laptop and all tasks are executed very quickly and without noticeable delays.

You can also use Intel apps thanks to Rosetta 2, and it works well, but you will notice a performance difference when you use complex applications like Photoshop or Premiere Pro, where the M1 versions are much snappier. We have included PugetBench results, but they are not really representative because they only run with the emulated Intel versions of the Adobe apps. It will obviously depend on the software you use, and if you can take advantage of ProRes, for example, the MacBooks with the M1 chips will have a massive advantage.

Apple uses faster PCIe 4. The read performance is similar to the smaller SSD, but the 1 TB model is faster in terms of write performance. In the AmorphousDiskMark 3. More SSD benchmarks are listed here. However, the M1 iGPU is much more efficient and requires less power. The gaming capabilities of the MacBook Pro 16 are much more limited compared to Windows laptops because there are just not as many games.

The two fans of the MacBook Pro 16 are much quieter compared to the inch model and hardly spin faster than 3, rpm even under maximum load, which results in around 37 dB A. If you only stress the processor or the graphics cards, you will hardly hear more than 27 dB A also during gaming , so the device is not very audible at all in normal environments despite the high performance. We did not notice any electronic noises like coil whine. The cooling system has no problems with the M1 Pro, and the surface temperatures are not very high under load despite the quiet fans.

The keyboard in particular stays cooler than the smaller MBP You will hardly notice any warming during most everyday tasks and the efficient architecture of the M1 Pro definitely pays off in this regard, because Windows rivals reach noticeably higher temperatures.

The performance of the M1 Pro is also stable during the stress test, which is not the case for powerful Windows laptops.

The speakers in the new MacBook Pro 16 have improved compared to the already excellent sound system in the old model and even perform slightly better than the MacBook Pro 14 in the frequency diagram.

Subjectively, the sound is great considering the chassis size and there is even some bass from the thin case thanks to four woofers. Apple also improved the integrated headset jack and it now supports headphones with higher impedance, but our measurement clearly shows that there are distortions at higher volume levels. This means it cannot replace a high-quality external amplifier, but it now supports high-impedance headphones.

We determine slightly more than 50 W under load on average and up to 90 W during the stress test, which means the MBP 16 is once again much more efficient than the Windows competition. The W power adapter is almost too powerful for the base model of the MBP 16 and we are a bit surprised that Apple does not save money and only ships it with the 96W power adapter.

This would not support fast charging, but this is also the case for the base model of the smaller MBP 14 , which is shipped with a 67 W PSU by default. The M1 Pro is also very efficient when we have a look at the internal consumption via powermetrics and there is no throttling or turbo peaks at the start of the benchmarks.

The battery capacity of the inch MacBook Pro is Our Wi-Fi test at an adjusted brightness of nits runs for almost 17 hours and is still around 8 hours at the maximum SDR brightness. Contrary to previous macOS versions, we did not see a difference when we used full-screen mode.

An HDR video at the maximum brightness ran for about 4. A standard video at nits on the other hand runs for about This is once again an advantage for the MacBook Pro 16 compared to the Windows competition, where powerful systems always reduce the performance especially dGPUs on battery power.

The new MacBook Pro 16 leaves a slightly better overall impression compared to the smaller inch model. The bulkier chassis design is not quite as noticeable and the full-fledged version of the M1 Pro is more convincing. The cooling solution is also quieter and you will hardly hear more than a quiet murmur with most tasks. In addition to the quiet fans, it provides good performance figures and the performance is very stable, both on mains as well as battery power.

We can pretty much repeat our verdict from the MBP 14 when we talk about the screen: The picture quality is extremely good, especially with HDR contents. The limitation to nits with standard SDR contents should be advertised by Apple and we would have appreciated higher brightness values outdoors. The constant PWM flickering can also cause issues for some users. The speakers are also a bit better compared to the smaller inch model.

The connectivity standards do not really meet the high-end expectations, either, because the Wi-Fi module, the HDMI port as well as the card reader leave room for improvement. There are also hardly any maintenance options and the storage and memory upgrades are very expensive.

However, it is good that Apple still offers that much internal storage up to 8 TB. The new MacBook Pro 16 is an impressive multimedia laptop and definitely one of the best devices for content creators, especially when they are working with HDR contents. The device stays very quiet and cool, despite the high performance, which is currently just not possible on comparable Windows laptops. If you are not sure whether you need the upgrade, you will probably be fine with the M1 Pro.

The MacBook Pro 16 is also a good choice if you just want a high-end multimedia laptop with a great screen, long battery runtime and great speakers and you are willing to pay the high price. However, you should know that the MacBook Pro is no gaming laptop, because there are not many blockbuster games for macOS.

Other areas like CAD, engineering depend on the software support as well. The availability of the new MacBook Pro 16 is currently limited. How does the full version of the M1 Pro perform? The Mini-LED panel once again impresses with great pictures just like on the smaller inch model.

Apple reintroduces “dusty” ports. Apple M1 Pro 10 x 2. Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. MacBook Pro 16 left vs. MacBook Pro 14 right. MagSafe connector with status LED. SD Card Reader. Function keys are back.